<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Report Casts Doubt on Effectiveness of Badger Cull</title>
	<atom:link href="http://britishecologicalsociety.org/blog/blog/2010/02/10/new-report-casts-doubt-on-cost-effectiveness-of-badger-cull/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://britishecologicalsociety.org/blog/blog/2010/02/10/new-report-casts-doubt-on-cost-effectiveness-of-badger-cull/</link>
	<description>Topical information for researchers, policy advisers and the public who are interested in the interaction between ecology and public policy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:06:05 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John A W Lock</title>
		<link>http://britishecologicalsociety.org/blog/blog/2010/02/10/new-report-casts-doubt-on-cost-effectiveness-of-badger-cull/comment-page-1/#comment-104636</link>
		<dc:creator>John A W Lock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britishecologicalsociety.org/blog/?p=865#comment-104636</guid>
		<description>Although to the majority of the public four years may not seem like a very long time before you have to repeat the control process, to the dairy farmer it represents a substantial rebate.  After all to avoid perennial problems such as mastitis (which removes more animals than ever bTB does) they have to carry out preventative procedures on a twice-daily basis, at which point once every four years doesn&#039;t look so bad.  The same situation apples with vermin in grain stores etc: you have to keep on repeating the procedures year after year after year.  There&#039;s no magic bullet that cleans out rodents or insects forever so it&#039;s hard to understand why we should expect to find one with a persistent pathogen like bTB.  After all we&#039;ve been trying to eliminate the human form for decades...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although to the majority of the public four years may not seem like a very long time before you have to repeat the control process, to the dairy farmer it represents a substantial rebate.  After all to avoid perennial problems such as mastitis (which removes more animals than ever bTB does) they have to carry out preventative procedures on a twice-daily basis, at which point once every four years doesn&#8217;t look so bad.  The same situation apples with vermin in grain stores etc: you have to keep on repeating the procedures year after year after year.  There&#8217;s no magic bullet that cleans out rodents or insects forever so it&#8217;s hard to understand why we should expect to find one with a persistent pathogen like bTB.  After all we&#8217;ve been trying to eliminate the human form for decades&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

